- When multiple unnormalized supplier names are mapped to a single normalized supplier name, Resilinc follows a standard logic to determine which RapidRatings score should be assigned to the normalized supplier.
- Score Assignment Logic:
Scenario 1: Different Reporting Dates
- If multiple supplier records normalized under the same supplier name have different reporting dates, the system selects the score from the supplier record with the most recent reporting date.
- Example
- Unnormalized Supplier 1: Acutec Precision Aerospace
- Unnormalized Supplier 2: Acutec Precision Manufacturing
- Normalized Supplier Name: ACUTEC PRECISION
Supplier | Reporting Date | FHR Score (Converted) |
Acutec Precision Aerospace | 10-Feb-26 | 50 (5.5) |
Acutec Precision Manufacturing | 10-Jan-26 | 48 (5.3) |
- Since 10 Feb 2026 is the latest reporting date, the system assigns the score 5.5 to the normalized supplier ACUTEC PRECISION.
Scenario 2: Same Reporting Dates
- If multiple unnormalized supplier names have the same reporting date, the system selects the supplier with the highest converted FHR score.
- This is the standard logic followed by the system for RapidRatings score assignment when multiple subsidiaries are normalized under a single parent supplier name.
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article